Sunday, 23 October 2016

Edology EdTech Updates is out! Edition of 23 October 2016

Edology EdTech Updates
Published by
Nick Chater
23 October 2016
Science Education Technology Art & Entertainment Sports Leisure #cpchat #edchat
Today's headline
Nintendo's Finally Pulling the Curtain Back on Its Mysterious 'NX' Game System
thumbnail www­.wired­.com - Nintendo's long-teased, never-unveiled new gaming platform finally has a name and, more importantly, has finally been revealed to the world, and… yeah, it's exactly what all the rumors have been sa...
Advertising is hard
We do it all day. Let us teach you what we've learned. Learn how the experts market their startups. Grab the free ebook.
272 contributors - featured today:
Read paper →

Email powered by logo

If you have not requested this notification or wish not to receive paper notification updates in the future unsubscribe here.

We are committed to protecting your privacy - more on our Privacy Policy.

Smallrivers SA, Innovation Park EPFL, Building C, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Friday, 21 October 2016

Noam Chomsky/ technology/ behaviour management/ art education/ Power of reading/ Howard Gardner and James Beane...

Education Readings

By Allan Alach

I welcome suggested articles, so if you come across a gem, email it to me at

Noam Chomsky on the Dangers of Standardized Testing
“The assessment itself is completely artificial. It’s not ranking teachers in accordance with their ability to help develop children who will reach their potential, explore their creative interests. Those things you’re not testing.. it’s a rank that’s mostly meaningless. And the very ranking itself is harmful. It’s turning us into individuals who devote our lives to achieving a rank. Not into doing things that are valuable and important.”

'Schools must appoint teacher coaches to keep staff up to speed with rapid changes in technology’
‘Probably the biggest problem teachers have is the rapid rate of change that occurs in our computer-driven culture. Things change so fast, that we are now faced with “data obsolescence”. That which we believe to be true today, may not be true, or might be replaced by another fact or improvement in the upcoming year. Unless the very system that educates our population keeps up with these changes in a timely fashion it will itself in time become irrelevant. The model of professional development that the system relies on most heavily is the same system that has been in place for at least century.’

How to Become and Remain a Transformational Teacher
‘However talented, no one is a natural-born teacher. Honing the craft takes significant care and effort, not just by the individual, but also by the school at large. Though experience does matter, it matters only to the extent that a teacher -- regardless of how long he or she has been in the classroom -- commits to continued professional development to refresh his or her status as a transformational teacher.’

This viral video perfectly sums up what’s wrong with education today, and how we can change it
‘Here, he’s pointing to the lack of freedom that teachers often have to adapt classes in the most effective way for their individual students. Teachers, he says, “have the most important job on the planet” and “should earn just as much as doctors”. But far from appreciating their expertise and efforts, politicians force them into restrictive boxes.’

The dark side of classroom behavior management charts
‘With each new school year come shiny new behavior management systems decorating the walls of elementary classrooms. From sticker charts to clip charts to color cards, teachers choose bright and engaging systems with the hope that a little incentive might lead to improved student behavior. The thing is, these systems rarely work for any extended period of time.’

Contributed by Bruce Hammonds:

#DSXOAK: A prototype school comes to life
‘If you could completely re-design the school experience, giving students the greatest possible creative agency, how would you do it?That’s what edu fellow David Clifford is prototyping in West Oakland this weekend during his design sprint. David is a self-described “agitator” who “love[s] to mess with old ideas.”“The thing that we’re trying to do is redesign high school for the 21st century kid to help them navigate and affect change in the 21st century,” said David.“The current school model is still building kids to navigate the 19th and 20th century.” That model is meant to “manage humanity instead of inspire it.”’

Arts-Infused Project-Based Learning: Crafting Beautiful Work
"I would argue that the arts is project-based learning,"says Emily Crowhurst, a music teacher. "In every music lesson, whether it's a project lesson or what you might deem a typical lesson, there areproject-based learning techniques going on naturally in the way that students are constantly critiquing and rehearsing what they're creating; and they're always working towards an end project that will have an authentic audience.”

Embracing Failure: Building a Growth Mindset Through the Arts
Teach your students the recipe for success: taking risks, making mistakes, and integrating critical feedback.
‘At New Mexico School for the Arts (NMSA) -- a dual arts and academic curriculum -- failure is taught as an important part of the journey toward success. Understanding that mistakes are indicators for areas of growth, freshmen learn to give and receive feedback. By senior year, students welcome tough, critical feedback -- and even insist on it.’

Rainstorms and Symphonies: Performing Arts Bring Abstract Concepts to Life

‘When early elementary teachers integrate music and theater, student learning improves in reading, math, and science as they become better critical thinkers and problem solvers.’

From Bruce’s ‘goldie oldies’ file:

Power through reading!
‘Reading, and writing, are not just processes to be 'achieved' but are all about power - power of the imagination, power of gaining messages through literature, and power to gain and share ideas that can change how you think. Unless students, particularly those from from families who lack 'cultural capital', appreciate this power why would they bother to read or write?.Arguments about literacy never seem to go away. Phonics or whole language arguments occupy literacy critics. Like the nature/ nurture argument the answer is both. Either or arguments only force proponents into corners; the future is always the best of both.’

Developing a democratic curriculum
‘Relating back to the ideas of John Dewey James Beane  believes that if people are to live democratic lives they must have the opportunity to learn what that way of life means. His ideas are based on the ability of students to participate in their own education. Democratic schools share a child centred approach but their larger goal is to change the undemocratic conditions of school themselves and in turn to reach out to the wider community.’

Five Minds for the Future
Howard Gardner, renowned worldwide for for his theory of multiple intelligences, shares his latest ideas in his new new book 'Five Minds for the Future'.Based on the premise that students are entering an accelerating world of change in every area of life Gardner believes that such changes call for new ways of learning and thinking in schools if students are to thrive in the world during the eras to come. The directions our society is taking and the future of our planet demands such 'new minds' able to explore creative alternatives for problems that cannot be anticipated.’

from leading and learning

Monday, 17 October 2016

The trouble with transfer: How can we make learning more flexible?

I define learning as the long-term retention of knowledge and skills and the ability to transfer between contexts. The retention bit is fairly straightforward and uncontroversial: if you can’t remember something tomorrow, can you really be said to have learned it? As Kirschner, Sweller & Clark put it, “If nothing has changed in long-term memory, nothing has been learned.”

Transfer though is a bit trickier. In essence it’s the quality flexibility; can what you know in one context be applied in another? As Daniel Willingham says, “Knowledge is flexible when it can be accessed out of the context in which it was learned and applied in new contexts.”

Memory is context dependent. Because transfer from one context to another is affected by the context of original learning, students can learn in one context, yet fail to transfer to other contexts. One study found that street children could perform complex mathematics when making sales in the street but were unable to answer equivalent problems presented in a school context. In another study, subjects did very well at making supermarket best-buy calculations despite doing poorly on similar paper-and-pencil mathematics problems. What we remember depends, to a greater or lesser extent, on the context in which we both learn and retrieve information as these studies by Weingartner & Smith indicate. 

So-called ‘far transfer’ between different subject domains – the idea that you could learn the skill of analysis in history and then apply it physics – is much more difficult than is often supposed. Experts (those who know a lot about a particular subject domain) find it far easier to transfer their knowledge to new contexts than novices (those who know little within a subject domain). This is not to claim that an expert physicist is more able than a physics novice to apply what they have learned in physics to history, just that they will find it more straightforward to transfer their knowledge to other areas of physics. As we’ll see in the next chapter, expertise is highly specific and experts and novices think in qualitatively different ways.

Susan Barnett and Stephen Ceci’s research has laid the building blocks for us to begin to understand the processes involved in transferring material learned from one context to another. In their 2002 paper When and Where Do We Apply What We Learn? A Taxonomy for Far Transfer they identified several factors that affect transfer.

The first three are concerned with the type of content being transferred: whether it is a learned skill, a change in performance or a feat of memory.


Content: what is transferred?

The other six are connected with the context in which the transfer takes place: the knowledge domain (whether learning can be transferred between the domains of say, history and biology), the physical context (from one place to another), temporal contexts (from one time to another), the functional context (between the academic and non-academic settings) and social contexts (between group situations and individual situations) and the modality (whether material can be transferred between speech and writing). In school, students may be able to transfer what they have learned from a history classroom to the examination hall but be unable to transfer the skill of analysing historical source material to analysing literary texts.


Context: when and where transferred to and from

Barnett and Ceci conclude that instances of far transfer are rare, but under the right conditions can happen, and may even turn out to be predictable. However, it is probably more productive for teachers to consider the possibilities of ‘near transfer’. Transfer from one problem to another within a course, from one year in school to another, from the classroom to the examination hall, between school and home, and from school to workplace.

As we’ve seen, our ability to retrieve information is heavily context dependent – we link what we know to related subject matter, times, places, people and feelings. These contextual links provide cues or prompts which helps us to retrieve what we need when we need it. The trouble is, when we learn a thing in one context we rely on environmental cues in order to recall it, when we change the context the absence of those cues can cause us to be unable to retrieve what may have been secure in another location.

Some kinds of near transfer appear quite straightforward. When subjects are asked questions which are closely related to material they have previously exposed to, they are able to transfer what they’ve learned, (Butler, 2010) but transfer does not seem to occur when subjects are asked questions on related material taken from the same section of a textbook. The finding seems to be that students have little difficulty in transferring learning when the exact information on which they are quizzed is used in a new situation, but quizzing on related information doesn’t help students to transfer information, even between closely related topics. Unfortunately, what we learn does not spontaneously or automatically generalise to new contexts and so teachers need to facilitate this process.

When students were prompted that they would need to transfer related information to novel situations they were far more likely to successfully apply what they had learned in a new context. It seems that prompting students may be a necessary condition for transfer to occur (Wooldridge et al, 2014).

While we cannot, of course, predict every conceivable context in which students will need to apply the knowledge and skills they teach, we can prepare students by explicitly informing them that the material being studied will need to be applied to a new context and then provide practice opportunities where they have to apply prior knowledge to novel situations. With luck, this will help students to recognise situations where they can apply what they know when they come up in the future.

We also need to recognise that the transfer of knowledge or skills to a novel problem requires both knowledge of the problem’s context and a deep understanding of the problem’s underlying structure. Experts and novices think in qualitatively different ways and what may be obvious to an expert may make little sense to a novice. Seeing underlying structures can be facilitated by using concrete examples. For instance, it’s hard to understand the structure of this problem because it’s so abstract:


The Wason Card Test

But, when the problem is presented differently, with a more familiar context, it’s much easier to understand:

The lesson for teachers is that the abstract example which makes perfect sense to us, may be meaningless for our students. We can, however, help students to see the underlying structures by presenting them with a concrete example that shares similar features.

Transfer between contexts is hard and, as I’ve explained before, students might not necessarily be able to transfer from the context of one seat to another seat in the same classroom! It’s worth knowing that we can weaken students’ dependency on context by varying the conditions in which ideas are encoded and retrieved. We can also facilitate transfer by explicitly telling students that they will need to retrieve what they’re studying in a new context. Using concrete examples will also help. But probably the most important thing for teachers to know is that the more you know, the easier it is to transfer what you know to new contexts.

The post The trouble with transfer: How can we make learning more flexible? appeared first on David Didau: The Learning Spy.

from David Didau: The Learning Spy | Brain food for the thinking teacher

ELL isn’t Language Instruction

I’ve only taught English once in a public school (a humanities class), but I’ve been teaching private instruction English for a decade. Language instruction it’s not. I took French for a few years, and vaguely remember having to study verbs, and verb forms. Something about subjunctives. Unlike my father, I’m terrible at all new languages that don’t tell […]

from educationrealist | No Dewey-eyed dreamers here

Sunday, 16 October 2016

Finding the truth about our performance – and facing it.


In one of my early posts, ‘How do I know how good my teachers are?’ I discuss the three main sources of information that inform my evaluation of the performance of my teaching staff: Data, Observation and ‘Knowledge’.  The first two are obvious enough; the last one refers to the collection of informal, ephemeral information that builds up over time from multiple sources.  The post highlights the necessity to triangulate between all three sources of information in order to make informed judgements that than then be used to support the improvement process.

At the level of individuals, departments or a whole school, the same combination of soft and hard data is available.  I’ve tried to suggest in this post that we need to give greater weight to ‘soft cycle’ data in order to judge a school, focusing more on processes than outcomes if we’re trying to measure what we value.  This is hard to do in practice when so much weight is placed on data outcomes in our accountability system. (See Progress 8 discussion here.)  Averaging out all the complexity to produce simple numerical measures is a major flaw in our system.

Taking all of the triangulated complexity by the horns, at Highbury Grove, in common with most schools I would imagine, we’ve been deeply immersed in a range of self-evaluation processes this half-term. There are various elements to this that form part of an on-going cycle.

  • Examination outcomes – slicing and dicing the data every which way at whole-school and departmental levels and comparing ourselves to similar schools and exploring trends over time.
  • Departmental Reviews – strengths and areas for development, as captured in the diagram below.
  • Writing our SEF – lining ourselves up against the OfSTED criteria.
  • Analysing parent and student survey responses – making sense of all those ‘strongly disagree, agree…’ responses, filtering out anything that is actionable.
  • Conducting our annual Professional Review process which involves every member of staff evaluating the extent to which they met the professional targets set last year. The review cycle also encompasses tackling any ‘significant concerns’ that emerge across the year, with individual action plans for anyone who needs one.
  • The Headteacher’s 360ยบ review – a blend of people saying nice things and telling some home-truths.
  • Exploring last year’s Exit Interviews – weeding out the constructive feedback from the whinges and moans.
Screen shot 2013-09-01 at 21.52.02

Our Departmental Review has triangulation embedded.

With all of this information and analysis, we hope to get to some kind of truth about our performance – as a school, as subject departments and as individuals. It’s always multi-layered; complex.  There are high points and low points; a matrix of strengths, successes, frustrations, disappointments -and, yes, failures.

The challenge we all face is to absorb all of this and to do something about it.   At every level, we need to face the truth. It’s just as important to explore why we’ve succeeded where we have as to  establish the causes of our failures. But looking your failures in the face is the most important and the most difficult thing to do.

Of course not all reasons for failures are excuses – but, if you are going to attack the problems effectively, you do need to feel that improvement is possible whilst also confronting the realities.  I often ask the question: with the same students and same staff, could we have done better?  The same applies to a teaching group:  with all the issues, exam changes, student needs, mitigating circumstances, could they have gained higher grades?  Usually the answer is yes – so we can focus on ‘how’ we could have done better. In fact, I’m deeply worried if anyone says no; if they suggest that we did the best we could.

In my experience, there are numerous barriers to facing the truth that need to be overcome:

Insecurity: If people are persistently on the defensive, you don’t get a good outcome. They don’t admit mistakes or accept openly that their own performance could improve. The spirit of shared accountabilty is important here, balancing that with individual responsibility.   Very often, a key task in getting people to face the truth is to deal with their insecurities and perceived threats; to reassure, encourage and support whilst mapping out a course to do better.

Over-confidence:  This has been a big historical factor in my school. Arriving to HGS in 2014, the governors had been talking in hubristic terms about ‘moving beyond Outstanding to World Class’. There was institutional confusion about getting an Outstanding grade from OfSTED (years ago) instead of being outstanding today.  The previous exam regime offered rich pickings from Speaking and Listening in English and coursework in various subjects leading to inflated value-added scores that allowed everyone to think things were fine.  The sharp fall in results that I inherited in the summer of 2014 was a shock to everyone. Changes to exams eliminating the gaming possibilities and three Heads in three years exposed the truth about the depth of learning.

The desire to be World Class turned out to be a damaging delusion – fuelled by a false sense of standards generated within the school and some positive parental feedback: the very positive experience of a cohort of high achieving students with vocal, supportive parents was taken to apply across the school; it turns out that this was a mistake.

Personal investment:  It’s hard to accept your ideas didn’t work.  For example, at HGS we are still turning things around from some pretty disastrous legacy structures that, evidently, did not work in the long run:

  • Hard-streaming into two bands fuelled complacency about the top band (Don’t worry about them, they’ll be fine)  and low expectations of the bottom band (Oh god they’re a nightmare).
  • Friday afternoon enrichment meant that most of our most vulnerable learners had a four and a half day week for five years.  Most didn’t even do the enrichment.
  • An over-reaching Specialist Schools model led to 80 or so low-literacy students playing football all morning on Fridays in Year 7 and then going home at lunch.
  • A KS3 curriculum which gave less time for MFL to the lowest ability band and had a deeply ineffective Humanities carousel instead of proper discrete History and Geography lessons.

We’ve eliminated all of these things – but it took some people a while to accept just how damaging they had been.  They left their mark.  Even though various people had harboured serious concerns, personal investment in these ideas from the top had inhibited discussion. It required a pretty determined effort during my first year to tackle the sacred cows. Fortunately, some of the governors could see what needed to be done.

Feeling overworked:  If you feel you slogged your guts out at the expense of your personal life or your health and you still didn’t get the rewards you feel you deserve in examination outcomes, it’s disheartening.  How could we have done more?  The point here is to reconsider what was being done, not simply suggest doing more.  If you’re going the extra mile in the wrong direction, you need to turn around and re-think! Still, the ‘doing all we can’ psychology is hard to overcome.

Inexperience with high standards:  With staff that have either only worked in one place for a long time and/or are inexperienced in general, their sense of what is possible or of what excellence might look like can be diminished.  Some people I’ve encountered over the years have given the impression that serial mediocrity is more or less inevitable and normal; it’s ceased to be disappointing.  e.g. being ‘really pleased’ with A level results despite getting very low ALPS scores.  The challenge here is show them that, elsewhere, higher standards exist and are possible to achieve.

I can see parallels in all of this between how a teacher is supported in the face of disappointing results and how a Head is supported in the face of a disappointing Progress 8 score or OfSTED judgement.  The data or grading doesn’t define us; it’s part of the picture but the best thing to do is to stare it in the face; to brush the excuses aside, to embrace the challenge,  remind yourself of all your strengths and successes and the team you have around you and get down to the nitty-gritty of solving the problems.



from headguruteacher | Zest for Learning… into the rainforest of teaching and school leadership

Edology EdTech Updates is out! Edition of 16 October 2016

Edology EdTech Updates
Published by
Nick Chater
16 October 2016
Science Education Technology Leisure Business Art & Entertainment #edchat #cpchat
Today's headline
While everyone fixates on Hunt, no one's noticed Richard Branson buying up all our GP practices | The Canary
thumbnail www­.thecanary­.co - While the nation fixates on Jeremy Hunt and his destruction of the NHS, we've missed the rise of another serious threat to our health service. It comes in the form of business tycoon Richard Branso...
Hire Smarter, Hire Faster
Top companies trust Toptal to match them with proven developers and designers. See how Toptal can make your next hire the best—and easiest—one yet.
263 contributors - featured today:
Read paper →

Email powered by logo

If you have not requested this notification or wish not to receive paper notification updates in the future unsubscribe here.

We are committed to protecting your privacy - more on our Privacy Policy.

Smallrivers SA, Innovation Park EPFL, Building C, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Beyond the ‘Show Sentence’

Back in January, I wrote about a method for improving pupils’ writing, coined as the ‘Show Sentence’. The method was simple: model sentence construction, using synonyms for words that come up often in analytical writing. Instead of ‘Shakespeare uses tricolon to show’, pupils had a number of different options in their armoury, such as highlight, emphasise, underline, imply, reveal, explore, among others.


We supply pupils with academic vocabulary for other parts of the analytical writing process, too. For example, when discussing characters (here, the witches in ‘Macbeth’), pupils were given a large bank of words to use, such as sinister, devilish, satanic, diabolical, fiendish, demonic, abominable, odious, nefarious, malevolent, and so on. Facts on pupils’ knowledge organisers, which were frequently tested and drilled, were used to link their analysis directly to the quotations and Shakespeare’s use of language. Again, they had a number of words available to them to use, e.g. ‘this would have horrified, yet fascinated/ terrified, yet intrigued/ alarmed, yet captivated the Jacobean audience’.


This, combined with a detailed, specified knowledge curriculum, enabled my bottom set year 8 class to write some fantastic sentences. For example:


Shakespeare amalgamates alliteration and chiasmus to reveal the witches’ demonic, satanic characters.


Shakespeare fuses alliteration with repetition and rhyme to demonstrate the malevolent sorcery of the devilish witches who would have horrified, yet fascinated the Jacobean audience. James I was petrified of witchcraft and wrote a book called Demonology in 1597.


Merging chiasmus with alliteration, Shakespeare cleverley implies that the witches are demonic, conniving and fiendish, and perhaps also they are determined to get Macbeth to commit abominable things.


The purpose of this exercise is to attempt to overcome some of the drawbacks of the PEE model. Whilst it is useful for pupils to have an overarching structure, a sequence of questions to respond to, and a number of sentence openers, this doesn’t really get to the heart of what pupils find difficult. Telling the class to start their sentence with ‘This demonstrates….’, is one thing, but many pupils (particularly the weakest) will struggle to know what to say next. A small part of me dies inside every time a kid puts their hand up to ask: “But Miss, what does it actually demonstrate?”.


The Show Sentence approach was designed with precisely this problem in mind. In the past I had assumed that my pupils had all the ideas, but just needed a structure to help them to write it down, but I now believe that it’s about much more than that. Pupils need clearer guidance on exactly what to say, not just how to say it.


This approach enables me to drill pupils in the hardest part of the analytical writing process every single day. I will often start a lesson with a quotation on the board, and ask pupils to annotate it in their books, looking specifically at striking vocabulary and techniques. Once they have done that, I then ask them to write a Show Sentence about the quotation. In the early stages, I need to model and give them guidance, and remind them of the vocabulary they could use, but eventually, they get into the habit and don’t require much help at all. After about 5 minutes or so, every child has written a lovely, analytical sentence about the quotation.


One legitimate challenge people made of the Show Sentence previously was that it would result in 30 identikit sentences, all containing the same words and ideas. Critics argued that the approach would hinder creativity and diversity of interpretation, that pupils were being too heavily spoon-fed and dictated to.


I’ll admit that in the beginning, this is a fairly accurate depiction of what happens, particularly with less able pupils. Over time, however, as they become more confident, they branch out and make it their own. In the early stages, they need this support because they are novices who would otherwise struggle. But in the long run, this is far better for their writing. Creativity in any form is simply the result of a happy union of converging bits of knowledge, and writing is no different.


Drilling pupils in this approach for months on end has really helped to improve their essays. Last week, the same class (now in year 9) wrote an essay on Shylock in The Merchant of Venice. Now that they have really embedded their understanding of the Show Sentence, and have automated including academic vocabulary and contextual links, paragraph writing becomes very straightforward.


When asking them to consider how Shylock’s character is developed throughout the play, I tell them to construct their paragraphs in this way:


  1. Write a sentence about Shylock’s characteristics in the scene.
  2. Quotation
  3. Show Sentence including context.
  4. Quotation
  5. Show Sentence including context and/or stagecraft.

Each pupil wrote three paragraphs using this structure, and some also managed to write a conclusion. They all had an hour and a half to write it, with only a page of brief notes to help them.

Whilst they still have a long way to go – particularly in terms of improving their written accuracy- their writing has improved enormously, and whilst there are some things that many essays have in common, no two essays are identical. Below are a few extracts from some of their essays.

essay-1 essay-2 essay-3 essay-4


Interested in our approaches? Come along to our event or buy our book! Available on Amazon here:


We are also hiring! More information on our website here:

from Tabula Rasa |